Reflection on Developing an Online Learning Module and Peer Review Process
The transition from planning a course to building it in an online learning management system (LMS), such as Canvas, is a critical step in ensuring that the course is both engaging and effective for students. The Canvas LMS offers numerous tools and features that help bring the course structure outlined in the storyboard to life. At this stage, the course will be developed in a shell, and the next step will be joining a peer-review group, allowing for valuable feedback before delivering the module to a live audience. This reflection will explore the importance of this process, the role of peer review in course development, and how the integration of Canvas tools can enhance the overall learning experience.
Building an Online Learning Module in Canvas
The Canvas LMS provides a robust platform that supports a wide range of teaching strategies, such as video integration, discussion forums, quizzes, and multimedia presentations (Instructure, 2020). As I begin developing the course shell, I will be able to organize content in modules, which will mirror the structured pieces laid out in the storyboard. The Canvas platform allows me to upload content, create assessments, and implement interactive learning activities in a centralized space. By utilizing features such as assignments, discussions, and quizzes, I can foster engagement and ensure that the course structure remains consistent with the learning objectives.
One key advantage of using Canvas is its ability to track student progress through various assessments. This functionality will be essential for monitoring how well students are engaging with the course content and whether the learning objectives are being met (Anderson, 2008). By creating formative assessments throughout the course, I will be able to gather data on student progress, which will guide any necessary modifications to the course content or teaching strategies in real time.
The Role of Peer Review in Course Development
Joining a peer-review group is a crucial next step in refining the online module. Peer feedback plays an essential role in improving the quality of the course design by offering diverse perspectives and insights that might not have been considered during the initial development process (Chickering & Gamson, 1987). In the context of online course development, peer reviews can help identify potential issues with content clarity, pacing, and engagement strategies before the course is delivered to a live audience (Morrison et al 2019).
In the peer-review process, I will not only receive feedback on the structure and clarity of my course but also on the use of Canvas features, ensuring that the tools employed (e.g., quizzes, multimedia, discussions) effectively enhance student engagement. Providing constructive feedback to peers will also allow me to evaluate the effectiveness of their course designs and reflect on how I can integrate similar strategies into my module (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008). This reciprocal review process fosters collaboration and ensures that the course meets the diverse needs of learners.
References
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK).
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Instructure. (2020). Canvas learning management system: Product overview. https://www.instructure.com/canvas/
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Power, R. (2023). Everyday instructional design: A practical resource for educators and instructional designers. Power Learning Solutions.
Comments
Post a Comment